Talk:Woody Guthrie

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Woody Guthrie article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3

Woody Guthrie is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 10, 2009.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 13, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed
April 9, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed
June 13, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
December 15, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
February 1, 2008	Featured article candidate	Promoted
August 11, 2009	Featured article review	Demoted
Current status: Former featured article

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as High-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	This article has had a peer review which is now archived.

Oklahoma High‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Roots music High‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roots music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to roots, folk and traditional folk music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roots musicWikipedia:WikiProject Roots musicTemplate:WikiProject Roots musicRoots music
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Transport: Maritime

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Maritime task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Singer-songwriter and musician

Isn't it redundant? Should be only "singer-songw" Cornerstonepicker (talk) 06:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Fixed. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 09:58, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The top part of the article is broken

Pretty self explanatory — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8803:802:E400:5973:8093:F680:2ED (talk) 03:07, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Personal life

The personal life section of the article appears to be missing but is included in the table of contents — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariojack3 (talk • contribs) 21:07, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for raising this. I'm not a technowikipedian but it looks like a queer (yes, I'm using that in the old sense of the word) bug. I've done a workaround. Some technical genius might be able to fix it and retain the quote box, too. sirlanz 00:07, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

American exceptionalism

To describe the song as a response to American Exceptionalism in "God Bless America" is an unfounded editorial opinion and not a provable fact. Recommend delete those words and substitute something more factual if desired. 75.42.35.133 (talk) 16:09, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia depends on reliable sources, not all of which are "provable facts" but can be informed perspectives by established individuals and institutions. In the case of the sentence in question, The Kennedy Center addresses the point here [1] and History.com here [2]. Dozens of other sources also identify the radically left basis for the song.

In addition, Guthries's original lyric includes three verses that were left out of performances by late 1950s-early 1960s performers like the Kingston Trio and Peter, Paul and Mary who helped revive the tune because the words were too specifically political:

There was a big high wall there that tried to stop me;

The sign was painted, it said private property;

But on the back side it didn’t say nothing;

That side was made for you and me.

Nobody living can ever stop me,

As I go walking that freedom highway;

Nobody living can ever make me turn back

This land was made for you and me.

And the original last verse:

In the squares of the city, In the shadow of a steeple;

By the Relief Office, I'd seen my people.

As they stood there hungry, I stood there asking,

Is this land made for you and me?

It's always valid to question the accuracy of text on Wikipedia, understanding that as above both facts and qualified perspectives can be reliable sources.Sensei48 (talk) 18:39, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I went further than your suggestion and removed "God Bless America" from the lead paragraph, because that fact is much less important to the song "This Land Is Your Land", and much less important to Guthrie's biography. Binksternet (talk) 18:40, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

=

Marriage years- inconsistency in article

The marriage/divorce years in the sidebar do not line up with the years in the "personal life" section of the article. Also, a part early in the article mentions he was married at 19, but that age doesn't line up with the 1943 date mentioned later.

Even if there is uncertainty around these dates, the article should have some consistency. -KaJunl (talk) 11:34, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]